Blog

If you’ve been watching the precious metals market lately, you’d be forgiven for doing a double take. Gold hit an all-time high of $5,589 an ounce on January 28th. Silver peaked above $121 in February. Both metals have since pulled back sharply, with gold now trading in the $4,400 range and silver near $65. And here’s the part that has a lot of people scratching their heads, this happened against a backdrop of an active war in the Middle East, rising geopolitical risk, an energy shock, and growing concerns about global growth. Under any traditional framework, that’s supposed to be one of the most bullish environments imaginable for precious metals. So what’s going on?

The short answer is that this is a liquidity story, not a story about the fundamentals breaking down.

When volatility spikes across multiple asset classes simultaneously, equities, bonds, currencies, commodities, it triggers mechanical selling across hedge funds, systematic strategies, and leveraged portfolios. These managers aren’t turning bearish on gold. They’re raising cash to meet margin calls and reduce exposure across the board. Gold, being one of the most liquid assets available, gets sold first and fastest. That’s precisely what happened here. Investors sold what they could, not what they believed in. We’ve seen this exact pattern before, in March of 2008 and again in March of 2020, and both times gold went on to significant new highs once the liquidity pressure cleared.

Compounding the selling pressure, the Gulf sovereign wealth funds and central banks that had been consistent and aggressive buyers of gold stepped back from the market as energy revenues stalled. That consistent bid at the margin disappeared right at the moment when selling pressure hit hardest, and prices dropped faster than they otherwise would have.

The Iran conflict created a genuine paradox for gold. The same geopolitical shock that should have been driving safe haven demand was also sending oil prices surging past $100 a barrel, feeding into inflation expectations, pushing bond yields higher, and keeping the Federal Reserve on hold. The Fed actually held rates steady despite a shocking -92,000 February jobs print, explicitly citing energy-driven inflation uncertainty as the reason. So you had the counterintuitive situation where the war was simultaneously creating the conditions that should push gold higher and the conditions, higher real rates, a stronger dollar, that were actively suppressing it. Standard Chartered’s commodities team has characterized this selling pressure as likely to persist for another four to six weeks, but views it as a temporary dynamic, not a structural shift.

We’ve also seen liquidations from more recent buyers, some forced by margin calls and some reflecting a genuine change of conviction after watching prices move this aggressively in both directions. That’s understandable. Some are questioning whether the easy money in this cycle has already been made, and after a run of this magnitude that’s a fair question to sit with.

On the physical side of the market, we’re starting to see a lot more product availability, metal that was very difficult to source not long ago is becoming more accessible as these liquidations work through the system. Financing rates, which is essentially the cost to access and hold inventory, have also come down considerably. When financing rates are elevated, it signals tight physical supply and strong institutional demand. Falling rates tell the opposite story, less competition for metal, more supply available. This confirms we are in a distribution and unwinding phase right now. For physical buyers, that can actually represent a more attractive entry point than we’ve seen in a while.

Now for the story that I think has been largely overlooked in all of this, Turkey.

Turkey’s central bank is reportedly considering tapping its roughly $135 billion in gold reserves to defend the lira, with discussions around conducting gold-for-foreign currency swap transactions in the London market. About $30 billion of those reserves are held at the Bank of England and would be the most accessible for intervention purposes. Turkey has already spent approximately $12 billion in a single week defending the lira and has offloaded around $16 billion in foreign currency bonds, including US Treasuries, in recent weeks. The benchmark interest rate sits at 37%, with the central bank now using an even more expensive 40% funding window to manage lira pressure.

This matters to the gold market for a specific reason. Turkey has been one of the most aggressive buyers of gold over the past decade, deliberately building reserves as a way to reduce exposure to US dollar-denominated assets, the same strategic rationale that has driven central bank gold buying globally. The possibility that Turkey now needs to reverse course and sell gold to defend its currency is a meaningful shift in the flow picture. It’s also a reminder that gold, even when held as a strategic reserve, can become a source of liquidity when the pressure gets intense enough. The news alone was enough to push gold modestly lower when it broke.

But here’s what the Turkey story actually illustrates, and why I think it reinforces the longer-term case rather than undermining it. Turkey is in this position precisely because it relies on imported oil and gas for almost all of its energy needs. It has 31.5% inflation. It needs to defend a currency in an environment where energy prices have spiked dramatically. The very forces that are creating this short-term pressure on gold are the forces, fiscal strain, energy dependence, currency fragility, debt burdens, that have been driving the structural case for gold for years. This is what monetary stress looks like in real time, and it’s playing out across emerging markets in ways that only reinforce why central banks have been accumulating gold in the first place.

The structural drivers of this bull market haven’t gone anywhere. Central bank buying continues as nations diversify reserves away from US Treasuries. US public debt has surged past $38 trillion with no credible path to fiscal discipline. De-dollarization and de-globalization are accelerating, not reversing. The petrodollar framework is under more stress than it has been in decades. If the current energy shock persists and global growth deteriorates, the probability of renewed large-scale monetary support rises materially, and historically, that transition has been one of the most powerful catalysts gold has. JPMorgan maintains a year-end target of $6,300; Deutsche Bank is at $6,000.

The metals haven’t failed as safe havens. They’ve behaved exactly as they have in every prior liquidity crisis. The thesis isn’t broken, the market is just working through a crowded trade, and that takes time. For investors with the right time horizon and position sizing, the current environment may look very different a year from now.